CGGR vs VTI
Capital Group Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CGGR or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CGGR led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGGR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $26.2B | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.15% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 97 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +8.23% | +14.43%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.64% | +18.05%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.37%Best | +22.93% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.74% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.3% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -28.9% | -22.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $19,793Best | $18,740 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.0% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Oct 12, 2026 (4.6 years).
CGGR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
CGGR vs VTI Performance
Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGGR returned +9.64% while VTI returned +18.05%. Year to date, CGGR is up 8.23% versus a gain of 14.43% for VTI.
Over three years, CGGR compounded at +25.37% per year against +22.93% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.3% compared with 15.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.9% for CGGR and -22.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGGR charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGGR currently yields 0.15% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
88.0% of CGGR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 46.2% of VTI's money is in holdings CGGR also owns.
Most of CGGR is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
78 positions in common, counted across the 96 positions we hold weights for in CGGR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 97 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,072 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for CGGR (51.3% of the fund), and 5 for CGGR that do not appear in VTI (3.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGGR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.86% | 6.40% | 1.54% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.55% | 4.79% | 0.24% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.50% | 6.29% | 3.79% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 6.13% | 1.70% | 4.43% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.61% | 2.56% | 2.05% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.48% | 3.65% | 1.17% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.11% | 2.90% | 0.21% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 3.24% | 2.31% | 0.93% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 4.21% | 1.22% | 2.99% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.57% | 1.29% | 2.28% |
88.0% of CGGR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGGR or VTI?
CGGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGGR or VTI?
Over the past year CGGR returned +9.64% vs +18.05% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGGR or VTI?
CGGR has been the more volatile fund at 19.3% annualized versus 15.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CGGR -28.9% vs VTI -22.4%.
Should I hold both CGGR and VTI?
CGGR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGGR and VTI?
88.0% of CGGR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 46.2% of VTI's is in holdings CGGR also owns. They hold 78 positions in common, counted across the 96 positions we hold weights for in CGGR and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGGR or VTI?
CGGR yields 0.15% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CGGR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CGGR led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.