CGGR vs VTI
Capital Group Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CGGR or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CGGR led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGGR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $25.1B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.15% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 103 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +4.95% | +12.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.19% | +17.22%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.60%Best | +20.87% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.4% | 15.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -28.9% | -22.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.5 years | $19,148Best | $18,399 |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Sep 11, 2026 (4.5 years).
CGGR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.5 years both funds cover.
CGGR vs VTI Performance
Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGGR returned +7.19% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, CGGR is up 4.95% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Over three years, CGGR compounded at +22.60% per year against +20.87% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGGR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 15.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.9% for CGGR and -22.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGGR charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGGR currently yields 0.15% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 87.5% of CGGR's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of CGGR is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
76 positions in common, counted across the 95 positions we hold weights for in CGGR and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 103 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGGR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 5.18% | 6.32% | 1.14% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 4.59% | 3.81% | 0.78% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.60% | 2.46% | 3.14% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.95% | 5.84% | 3.89% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 6.25% | 0.00% | 6.25% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.17% | 2.88% | 0.29% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.70% | 3.17% | 0.47% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.90% | 1.79% | 2.11% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 3.35% | 2.27% | 1.08% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 3.66% | 1.63% | 2.03% |
87.5% of CGGR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGGR or VTI?
CGGR has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGGR or VTI?
Over the past year CGGR returned +7.19% vs +17.22% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGGR or VTI?
CGGR has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 15.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CGGR -28.9% vs VTI -22.4%.
Should I hold both CGGR and VTI?
CGGR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGGR and VTI?
At least 87.5% of CGGR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 76 positions in common, counted across the 95 positions we hold weights for in CGGR and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGGR or VTI?
CGGR yields 0.15% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CGGR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CGGR led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.