DFSU vs IWFG
Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF vs NYLIM Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, DFSU or IWFG?
Each has led over a different period.
DFSU has a lower expense ratio. DFSU led over 1Y and 3Y, IWFG over the full window. DFSU is less concentrated, with 31.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DFSU | IWFG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15%Best | 0.46% |
| AUM | $2.3B | $33M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.84% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 1,958 | 56 |
| YTD Return | +10.28%Best | -4.37% |
| 1Y Return | +13.16%Best | -4.90% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.37%Best | +16.55% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5%Best | 16.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.9%Best | -22.0% |
| $10,000 over 4 years | $19,879 | $21,280Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 31.8%Best | 64.2% |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | New York Life Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2022 | Jun 22, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 2, 2022 to Nov 13, 2026 (4 years).
DFSU vs IWFG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4 years both funds cover.
DFSU vs IWFG Performance
Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU) is an ETF from Dimensional and NYLIM Winslow Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (IWFG) is an ETF from New York Life Investments. Over the past year DFSU returned +13.16% while IWFG returned -4.90%. Year to date, DFSU is up 10.28% versus a loss of 4.37% for IWFG.
Over three years, DFSU compounded at +19.37% per year against +16.55% for IWFG. Across the full 4-year window we track, IWFG has the edge at +20.78% annualized vs +18.74%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IWFG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 13.5% for DFSU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.9% for DFSU and -22.0% for IWFG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DFSU charges 0.15% per year while IWFG charges 0.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $46 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DFSU currently yields 0.84% against 0.00% for IWFG.
Holdings Overlap
31.0% of DFSU's money is in holdings IWFG also owns. 86.6% of IWFG's money is in holdings DFSU also owns.
Most of IWFG is already inside DFSU. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
23 positions in common, counted across the 1,979 positions we hold weights for in DFSU and 26 in IWFG, against full books of 1,958 and 56.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 2 positions for IWFG that do not appear in our book for DFSU (6.8% of the fund), and 1,109 for DFSU that do not appear in IWFG (66.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DFSU | Weight in IWFG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.47% | 15.33% | 7.86% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 1.42% | 10.79% | 9.37% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 6.48% | 5.30% | 1.18% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.42% | 6.65% | 3.23% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.05% | 6.10% | 3.05% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.13% | 4.53% | 1.40% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 1.39% | 2.88% | 1.49% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 0.68% | 3.35% | 2.67% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc | 0.17% | 3.63% | 3.46% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 0.90% | 2.85% | 1.95% |
86.6% of IWFG is already inside DFSU.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DFSU or IWFG?
DFSU has an expense ratio of 0.15% while IWFG charges 0.46%. DFSU is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DFSU or IWFG?
Over the past year DFSU returned +13.16% vs -4.90% for IWFG, so DFSU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DFSU annualized +18.74% vs +20.78% for IWFG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DFSU or IWFG?
IWFG has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 13.5% for DFSU. Worst drawdown: DFSU -19.9% vs IWFG -22.0%.
Should I hold both DFSU and IWFG?
DFSU and IWFG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DFSU and IWFG?
86.6% of IWFG's money is in holdings DFSU also owns. 86.6% of IWFG's is in holdings DFSU also owns. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 1,979 positions we hold weights for in DFSU and 26 in IWFG.
Which pays a higher dividend, DFSU or IWFG?
DFSU yields 0.84% while IWFG yields 0.00%, so DFSU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IWFG better than DFSU?
DFSU has a lower expense ratio. DFSU led over 1Y and 3Y, IWFG over the full window. DFSU is less concentrated, with 31.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.