DFSU vs IWLG
Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF vs NYLIM Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, DFSU or IWLG?
Each has led over a different period.
DFSU has a lower expense ratio. DFSU led over 1Y and 3Y, IWLG over the full window. DFSU is less concentrated, with 31.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DFSU | IWLG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $2.3B | $281M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.84% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 1,958 | 82 |
| YTD Return | +11.22%Best | +0.29% |
| 1Y Return | +12.36%Best | -2.24% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.73%Best | +18.02% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5%Best | 17.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.9%Best | -23.2% |
| $10,000 over 4 years | $20,067 | $22,030Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 31.8%Best | 57.8% |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | New York Life Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2022 | Jun 22, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 2, 2022 to Nov 11, 2026 (4 years).
DFSU vs IWLG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4 years both funds cover.
DFSU vs IWLG Performance
Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSU) is an ETF from Dimensional and NYLIM Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF (IWLG) is an ETF from New York Life Investments. Over the past year DFSU returned +12.36% while IWLG returned -2.24%. Year to date, DFSU is up 11.22% versus a gain of 0.29% for IWLG.
Over three years, DFSU compounded at +20.73% per year against +18.02% for IWLG. Across the full 4-year window we track, IWLG has the edge at +21.83% annualized vs +19.02%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IWLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 13.5% for DFSU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.9% for DFSU and -23.2% for IWLG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DFSU charges 0.15% per year while IWLG charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $50 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DFSU currently yields 0.84% against 0.00% for IWLG.
Holdings Overlap
34.8% of DFSU's money is in holdings IWLG also owns. 88.0% of IWLG's money is in holdings DFSU also owns.
Most of IWLG is already inside DFSU. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
33 positions in common, counted across the 1,979 positions we hold weights for in DFSU and 41 in IWLG, against full books of 1,958 and 82.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 3 positions for IWLG that do not appear in our book for DFSU (4.8% of the fund), and 1,098 for DFSU that do not appear in IWLG (63.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DFSU | Weight in IWLG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.47% | 13.86% | 6.39% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 1.42% | 10.92% | 9.50% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 6.48% | 4.61% | 1.87% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.42% | 7.66% | 4.24% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.13% | 3.57% | 0.44% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.05% | 3.26% | 0.21% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 1.39% | 4.06% | 2.67% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.09% | 2.75% | 0.66% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 0.90% | 3.72% | 2.82% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 0.64% | 2.63% | 1.99% |
88.0% of IWLG is already inside DFSU.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DFSU or IWLG?
DFSU has an expense ratio of 0.15% while IWLG charges 0.50%. DFSU is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DFSU or IWLG?
Over the past year DFSU returned +12.36% vs -2.24% for IWLG, so DFSU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), DFSU annualized +19.02% vs +21.83% for IWLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DFSU or IWLG?
IWLG has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 13.5% for DFSU. Worst drawdown: DFSU -19.9% vs IWLG -23.2%.
Should I hold both DFSU and IWLG?
DFSU and IWLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DFSU and IWLG?
88.0% of IWLG's money is in holdings DFSU also owns. 88.0% of IWLG's is in holdings DFSU also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 1,979 positions we hold weights for in DFSU and 41 in IWLG.
Which pays a higher dividend, DFSU or IWLG?
DFSU yields 0.84% while IWLG yields 0.00%, so DFSU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IWLG better than DFSU?
DFSU has a lower expense ratio. DFSU led over 1Y and 3Y, IWLG over the full window. DFSU is less concentrated, with 31.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.