DSTL vs SCHV

DSTL vs SCHV

Which is better, DSTL or SCHV?

Each has led over a different period.

SCHV has a lower expense ratio. DSTL led over 5Y and the full window, SCHV over 1Y and 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. DSTL is less concentrated, with 19.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 20.9%.

Lower Fees: SCHVHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: DSTL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDSTLSCHV
Expense Ratio0.39%0.04%Best
AUM$2.0B$15.2B
Dividend Yield1.06%1.77%
Holdings300560
YTD Return+12.75%+15.24%Best
1Y Return+16.90%+20.45%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+14.85%+19.16%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+11.23%Best+10.74%
Volatility (annualized)17.3%16.6%Best
Max Drawdown-33.1%Best-37.1%
$10,000 over 5 years$17,026Best$16,654
Top 10 Weight19.9%Best20.9%
Fund FamilyDistillate Capital EtfsCharles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionOct 23, 2018Dec 11, 2009

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2018 to Oct 13, 2026 (8 years).

DSTL vs SCHV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.

Compare DSTL against instead:DSTL vs SPYDSTL vs QQQDSTL vs VOODSTL vs VTISCHV against:SCHV vs VXUS

DSTL vs SCHV Performance

Distillate US Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) is an ETF from Distillate Capital Etfs and Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year DSTL returned +16.90% while SCHV returned +20.45%. Year to date, DSTL is up 12.75% versus a gain of 15.24% for SCHV.

Over three years, DSTL compounded at +14.85% per year against +19.16% for SCHV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.23% and +10.74% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, DSTL has the edge at +14.32% annualized vs +10.56%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DSTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 16.6% for SCHV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.1% for DSTL and -37.1% for SCHV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DSTL charges 0.39% per year while SCHV charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $4 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DSTL currently yields 1.06% against 1.77% for SCHV.

Holdings Overlap

DSTL already in SCHV67.3%
SCHV already in DSTL10.5%

67.3% of DSTL's money is in holdings SCHV also owns. 10.5% of SCHV's money is in holdings DSTL also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

67 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 555 in SCHV, against full books of 300 and 560.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 473 positions for SCHV that do not appear in our book for DSTL (88.3% of the fund), and 32 for DSTL that do not appear in SCHV (32.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in DSTLWeight in SCHVDifference
MRKMerck & Company Inc2.62%1.12%1.50%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.1.86%1.43%0.43%
ACNAccenture Plc2.36%0.36%2.00%
MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp2.02%0.37%1.65%
CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa1.96%0.28%1.68%
ABTAbbott Laboratories1.25%0.56%0.69%
MOAltria Group Inc.1.42%0.36%1.06%
ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc.1.41%0.34%1.07%
ICEInternational Exchange, Inc.1.36%0.28%1.08%
CMECme Group, Cl A1.31%0.32%0.99%

67.3% of DSTL is already inside SCHV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

DSTLSCHV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DSTL or SCHV?

DSTL has an expense ratio of 0.39% while SCHV charges 0.04%. SCHV is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, DSTL or SCHV?

Over the past year DSTL returned +16.90% vs +20.45% for SCHV, so SCHV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DSTL annualized +14.32% vs +10.56% for SCHV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DSTL or SCHV?

DSTL has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 16.6% for SCHV. Worst drawdown: DSTL -33.1% vs SCHV -37.1%.

Should I hold both DSTL and SCHV?

DSTL and SCHV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between DSTL and SCHV?

67.3% of DSTL's money is in holdings SCHV also owns. 10.5% of SCHV's is in holdings DSTL also owns. They hold 67 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in DSTL and 555 in SCHV.

Which pays a higher dividend, DSTL or SCHV?

DSTL yields 1.06% while SCHV yields 1.77%, so SCHV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SCHV better than DSTL?

SCHV has a lower expense ratio. DSTL led over 5Y and the full window, SCHV over 1Y and 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. DSTL is less concentrated, with 19.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 20.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.