DYNF vs IVV
iShares US Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DYNF delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DYNF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.26% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $38.2B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.79% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 189 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +15.47% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.95% | +23.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.28% | +21.49% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.44% | +13.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 19, 2019 | May 15, 2000 |
DYNF vs IVV Performance
iShares US Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) is a ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DYNF returned +25.95% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, DYNF is up 15.47% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, DYNF compounded at +25.28% per year against +21.49% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +15.44% and +13.43% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, DYNF has the edge at +16.46% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DYNF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.7% for DYNF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DYNF charges 0.26% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $26 vs $3 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DYNF currently yields 0.79% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DYNF and IVV share 146 holdings out of 547 unique holdings combined, representing a 61.8% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DYNF or IVV?
DYNF has an expense ratio of 0.26% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $23 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DYNF or IVV?
Over the past year DYNF returned +25.95% vs +23.70% for IVV, so DYNF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), DYNF annualized +16.46% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DYNF or IVV?
DYNF has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DYNF -34.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DYNF and IVV?
DYNF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between DYNF and IVV?
DYNF and IVV share 146 common holdings with a 61.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 547 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DYNF or IVV?
DYNF yields 0.79% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.