DYNF vs VTI
iShares US Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, DYNF or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DYNF led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DYNF | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.26% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $41.4B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.80% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 229 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +15.98%Best | +13.95% |
| 1Y Return | +23.92%Best | +21.44% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.29%Best | +21.10% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.17%Best | +11.77% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7%Best | 16.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.7%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,263Best | $17,443 |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 19, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 21, 2019 to Sep 3, 2026 (7.5 years).
DYNF vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.5 years both funds cover.
DYNF vs VTI Performance
iShares US Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DYNF returned +23.92% while VTI returned +21.44%. Year to date, DYNF is up 15.98% versus a gain of 13.95% for VTI.
Over three years, DYNF compounded at +25.29% per year against +21.10% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +15.17% and +11.77% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, DYNF has the edge at +16.35% annualized vs +14.84%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 16.7% for DYNF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.7% for DYNF and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DYNF charges 0.26% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $26 vs $3 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DYNF currently yields 0.80% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 98.3% of DYNF's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of DYNF is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
204 positions in common, counted across the 227 positions we hold weights for in DYNF and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 229 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DYNF | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 8.41% | 6.32% | 2.09% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.30% | 5.84% | 1.46% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.15% | 3.81% | 1.34% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.30% | 3.17% | 1.13% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 2.59% | 2.88% | 0.29% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.98% | 2.46% | 0.52% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.82% | 1.11% | 2.71% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.14% | 2.27% | 0.13% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 2.20% | 1.70% | 0.50% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 2.80% | 0.78% | 2.02% |
98.3% of DYNF is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DYNF or VTI?
DYNF has an expense ratio of 0.26% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DYNF or VTI?
Over the past year DYNF returned +23.92% vs +21.44% for VTI, so DYNF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DYNF annualized +16.35% vs +14.84% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DYNF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 16.7% for DYNF. Worst drawdown: DYNF -34.7% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both DYNF and VTI?
DYNF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DYNF and VTI?
At least 98.3% of DYNF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 204 positions in common, counted across the 227 positions we hold weights for in DYNF and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, DYNF or VTI?
DYNF yields 0.80% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than DYNF?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DYNF led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.