EFIV vs QQQ
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, EFIV or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
EFIV has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. EFIV is less concentrated, with 40.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFIV | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.93% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 332 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +11.94% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.57% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.08% | +25.63%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.11% | +15.24%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7%Best | 20.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,347 | $20,324Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.7%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 27, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 28, 2020 to Sep 18, 2026 (6.1 years).
EFIV vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.1 years both funds cover.
EFIV vs QQQ Performance
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EFIV returned +18.57% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, EFIV is up 11.94% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Over three years, EFIV compounded at +21.08% per year against +25.63% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +14.11% and +15.24% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.94% annualized vs +17.17%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.4% compared with 15.7% for EFIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for EFIV and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFIV charges 0.10% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $18 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFIV currently yields 0.93% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
51.1% of EFIV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 58.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings EFIV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
52 positions in common, counted across the 327 positions we hold weights for in EFIV and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 332 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 44 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for EFIV (39.0% of the fund), and 270 for EFIV that do not appear in QQQ (48.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EFIV | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 13.03% | 8.44% | 4.59% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 9.18% | 5.76% | 3.42% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.85% | 3.36% | 1.49% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.64% | 4.43% | 1.79% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 3.86% | 3.13% | 0.73% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.12% | 2.41% | 1.29% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 1.07% | 2.23% | 1.16% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.06% | 2.10% | 1.04% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 1.02% | 1.84% | 0.82% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.89% | 1.86% | 0.97% |
58.5% of QQQ is already inside EFIV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFIV or QQQ?
EFIV has an expense ratio of 0.10% while QQQ charges 0.18%. EFIV is the cheaper option, by $8 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EFIV or QQQ?
Over the past year EFIV returned +18.57% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), EFIV annualized +17.17% vs +18.94% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EFIV or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.4% annualized versus 15.7% for EFIV. Worst drawdown: EFIV -24.5% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both EFIV and QQQ?
EFIV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EFIV and QQQ?
58.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings EFIV also owns. 58.5% of QQQ's is in holdings EFIV also owns. They hold 52 positions in common, counted across the 327 positions we hold weights for in EFIV and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFIV or QQQ?
EFIV yields 0.93% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EFIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than EFIV?
EFIV has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. EFIV is less concentrated, with 40.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.