EFIV vs SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Which is better, EFIV or SPY?
Nearly the same fund. SPY costs less.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. EFIV led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, SPY over 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. SPY is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFIV | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.09%Best |
| AUM | $1.0B | $804.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.93% | 0.98% |
| Holdings | 332 | 505 |
| YTD Return | +11.94% | +12.09%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.57%Best | +16.29% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.08% | +21.20%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.11%Best | +13.37% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5%Tie | -24.5%Tie |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,347Best | $18,728 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.7% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 27, 2020 | Jan 22, 1993 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 28, 2020 to Sep 18, 2026 (6.1 years).
EFIV vs SPY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.1 years both funds cover.
EFIV vs SPY Performance
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year EFIV returned +18.57% while SPY returned +16.29%. Year to date, EFIV is up 11.94% versus a gain of 12.09% for SPY.
Over three years, EFIV compounded at +21.08% per year against +21.20% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +14.11% and +13.37% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, EFIV has the edge at +17.17% annualized vs +16.50%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EFIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.5% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for EFIV and -24.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFIV charges 0.10% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $9 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFIV currently yields 0.93% against 0.98% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
98.7% of EFIV's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 61.0% of SPY's money is in holdings EFIV also owns.
Most of EFIV is already inside SPY. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
325 positions in common, counted across the 327 positions we hold weights for in EFIV and 504 in SPY, against full books of 332 and 505.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 177 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for EFIV (38.9% of the fund), and 2 for EFIV that do not appear in SPY (1.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EFIV | Weight in SPY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 13.03% | 8.01% | 5.02% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 9.18% | 5.66% | 3.52% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.85% | 2.99% | 1.86% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 3.86% | 2.39% | 1.47% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.64% | 1.60% | 1.04% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.23% | 1.40% | 0.83% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 1.54% | 0.94% | 0.60% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 1.16% | 0.71% | 0.45% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.12% | 0.71% | 0.41% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.11% | 0.70% | 0.41% |
98.7% of EFIV is already inside SPY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFIV or SPY?
EFIV has an expense ratio of 0.10% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EFIV or SPY?
Over the past year EFIV returned +18.57% vs +16.29% for SPY, so EFIV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), EFIV annualized +17.17% vs +16.50% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EFIV or SPY?
EFIV has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.5% for SPY. Worst drawdown: EFIV -24.5% vs SPY -24.5%.
Should I hold both EFIV and SPY?
EFIV and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EFIV and SPY?
98.7% of EFIV's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 61.0% of SPY's is in holdings EFIV also owns. They hold 325 positions in common, counted across the 327 positions we hold weights for in EFIV and 504 in SPY.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFIV or SPY?
EFIV yields 0.93% while SPY yields 0.98%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPY better than EFIV?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. EFIV led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, SPY over 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. SPY is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.