FELC vs VOO
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FELC or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FELC led over 1Y and the full window, VOO over 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FELC | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $8.5B | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.81% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 590 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +16.17%Best | +14.81% |
| 1Y Return | +20.56%Best | +18.66% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.61% | +23.30%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.98% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.7% | 11.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.6%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $18,060Best | $17,818 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.8% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 20, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 20, 2023 to Oct 12, 2026 (2.9 years).
FELC vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
FELC vs VOO Performance
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FELC returned +20.56% while VOO returned +18.66%. Year to date, FELC is up 16.17% versus a gain of 14.81% for VOO.
Over three years, FELC compounded at +22.61% per year against +23.30% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FELC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.7% compared with 11.6% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.6% for FELC and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FELC charges 0.18% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FELC currently yields 0.81% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
92.2% of FELC's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 77.6% of VOO's money is in holdings FELC also owns.
Most of FELC is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, FELC as of Sep 15, 2026 and VOO as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
192 positions in common, counted across the 278 positions we hold weights for in FELC and 494 in VOO, against full books of 590 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 296 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for FELC (21.6% of the fund), and 47 for FELC that do not appear in VOO (4.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FELC | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.36% | 7.55% | 0.81% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.79% | 7.05% | 0.74% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.95% | 5.36% | 0.41% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.91% | 4.13% | 0.22% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.21% | 3.24% | 0.03% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.75% | 2.86% | 0.11% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.12% | 2.62% | 0.50% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.18% | 1.90% | 0.28% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.83% | 1.46% | 0.37% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.68% | 1.44% | 0.24% |
92.2% of FELC is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FELC or VOO?
FELC has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FELC or VOO?
Over the past year FELC returned +20.56% vs +18.66% for VOO, so FELC leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FELC or VOO?
FELC has been the more volatile fund at 11.7% annualized versus 11.6% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FELC -18.6% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both FELC and VOO?
FELC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FELC and VOO?
92.2% of FELC's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 77.6% of VOO's is in holdings FELC also owns. They hold 192 positions in common, counted across the 278 positions we hold weights for in FELC and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, FELC or VOO?
FELC yields 0.81% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than FELC?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FELC led over 1Y and the full window, VOO over 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.