FEMG vs MID
Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF vs American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF
Which is better, FEMG or MID?
FEMG costs less.
FEMG has a lower expense ratio. FEMG is less concentrated, with 23.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FEMG | MID |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.23%Best | 0.39% |
| AUM | $6M | $104M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.19% | 0.14% |
| Holdings | 168 | 35 |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.8%Best | 52.3% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | American Century Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | Apr 28, 2026 | Jul 15, 2020 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 17 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. FEMG has data through Oct 26, 2026 and MID through Oct 9, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FEMG charges 0.23% per year while MID charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $23 vs $39 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEMG currently yields 0.19% against 0.14% for MID.
Holdings Overlap
17.5% of FEMG's money is in holdings MID also owns. 55.9% of MID's money is in holdings FEMG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 169 positions we hold weights for in FEMG and 34 in MID, against full books of 168 and 35.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 12 positions for MID that do not appear in our book for FEMG (37.3% of the fund), and 142 for FEMG that do not appear in MID (78.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FEMG | Weight in MID | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NETCloudflare Inc (180 Day Lockup) | 3.57% | 7.80% | 4.23% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 1.91% | 4.68% | 2.77% |
| MTSIMacom Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 1.15% | 4.78% | 3.63% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 0.43% | 5.47% | 5.04% |
| CMGChipotle Mexican Grill Inc. Class A | 0.70% | 4.58% | 3.88% |
| VSTVistra Energy Corp. | 1.78% | 3.17% | 1.39% |
| NTRANatera Inc | 1.95% | 2.06% | 0.11% |
| ALNYAlnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 0.47% | 3.14% | 2.67% |
| RDDTReddit Inc-Cl A | 0.92% | 2.62% | 1.70% |
| VRTVertiv Holdings Co | 0.22% | 3.02% | 2.80% |
55.9% of MID is already inside FEMG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FEMG or MID?
FEMG has an expense ratio of 0.23% while MID charges 0.39%. FEMG is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FEMG and MID?
55.9% of MID's money is in holdings FEMG also owns. 55.9% of MID's is in holdings FEMG also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 169 positions we hold weights for in FEMG and 34 in MID.
Which pays a higher dividend, FEMG or MID?
FEMG yields 0.19% while MID yields 0.14%, so FEMG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MID better than FEMG?
FEMG has a lower expense ratio. FEMG is less concentrated, with 23.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.