IVV vs SASS

IVV vs SASS

Which is better, IVV or SASS?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.6%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVSASS
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.75%
AUM$876.4B$76M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings50824
YTD Return+13.32%Best-5.16%
1Y Return+17.08%-
3Y Return (annualized)+22.72%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.20%-
Top 10 Weight37.8%Best58.6%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)MD Sass
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionMay 15, 2000Mar 4, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs SASS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs SASS Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and M.D. Sass Concentrated Value ETF (SASS) is an ETF from MD Sass. Year to date, IVV is up 13.32% versus a loss of 5.16% for SASS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while SASS charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for SASS.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in SASS5.3%
SASS already in IVV59.3%

5.3% of IVV's money is in holdings SASS also owns. 59.3% of SASS's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

13 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 22 in SASS, against full books of 508 and 24.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 8 positions for SASS that do not appear in our book for IVV (36.4% of the fund), and 469 for IVV that do not appear in SASS (93.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in SASSDifference
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.84%7.20%3.36%
HSICHenry Schein Inc0.01%6.64%6.63%
COFCapital One Financial Corp.0.20%6.10%5.90%
DGXQuest Diagnostics Inc0.04%5.85%5.81%
AMEAmetek Inc0.08%5.48%5.40%
WMBWilliams Cos. Inc.0.14%5.04%4.90%
WELLWelltower, Inc.0.25%4.86%4.61%
ADIAnalog Devices, Inc.0.27%4.71%4.44%
MLMMartin Marietta Materials Inc.0.05%4.06%4.01%
ARESAres Management Corp A0.05%3.08%3.03%

59.3% of SASS is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVSASS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or SASS?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SASS charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SASS?

59.3% of SASS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 59.3% of SASS's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 22 in SASS.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SASS?

IVV yields 1.06% while SASS yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SASS better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.