IVV vs SEIQ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs SEI QiM US Large Cap Quality Active ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SEIQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.15% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $710M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.65% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 64 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +7.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +10.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +14.71% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -14.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 18, 2022 |
IVV vs SEIQ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and SEI QiM US Large Cap Quality Active ETF (SEIQ) is a ETF from SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while SEIQ returned +10.64%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 7.79% for SEIQ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +14.71% for SEIQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, SEIQ has the edge at +13.88% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.3% for SEIQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -14.9% for SEIQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SEIQ charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $15 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.65% for SEIQ.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SEIQ share 56 holdings out of 512 unique holdings combined, representing a 32.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SEIQ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SEIQ charges 0.15%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SEIQ?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +10.64% for SEIQ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +13.88% for SEIQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SEIQ?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.3% for SEIQ. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SEIQ -14.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and SEIQ?
IVV and SEIQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SEIQ?
IVV and SEIQ share 56 common holdings with a 32.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 512 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SEIQ?
IVV yields 1.10% while SEIQ yields 0.65%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.