SEIQ vs VYM
SEI QiM US Large Cap Quality Active ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, SEIQ or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SEIQ | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $729M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.63% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 64 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +5.32% | +13.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.54% | +17.82%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.22% | +17.99%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.16% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.4%Best | 13.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.9% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.3 years | $16,965 | $17,147Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.1% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 18, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 18, 2022 to Sep 10, 2026 (4.3 years).
SEIQ vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.3 years both funds cover.
SEIQ vs VYM Performance
SEI QiM US Large Cap Quality Active ETF (SEIQ) is an ETF from SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SEIQ returned +7.54% while VYM returned +17.82%. Year to date, SEIQ is up 5.32% versus a gain of 13.15% for VYM.
Over three years, SEIQ compounded at +13.22% per year against +17.99% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +13.36% annualized vs +13.08%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.9% compared with 13.4% for SEIQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.9% for SEIQ and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SEIQ charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SEIQ currently yields 0.63% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
32.6% of SEIQ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 20.3% of VYM's money is in holdings SEIQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, SEIQ as of Aug 18, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
23 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in SEIQ and 603 in VYM, against full books of 64 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 545 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for SEIQ (77.1% of the fund), and 40 for SEIQ that do not appear in VYM (67.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SEIQ | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.34% | 7.29% | 6.95% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 3.84% | 2.54% | 1.30% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 3.25% | 1.93% | 1.32% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 2.27% | 1.42% | 0.85% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 2.44% | 1.17% | 1.27% |
| MOAltria Group Inc. | 2.27% | 0.50% | 1.77% |
| CLColgate-Palmolive Co | 2.26% | 0.30% | 1.96% |
| ITWIllinois Tool Works Inc. | 2.22% | 0.32% | 1.90% |
| YUMYum! Brands, Inc. | 1.96% | 0.18% | 1.78% |
| VRSNVerisign Inc. | 1.99% | 0.09% | 1.90% |
32.6% of SEIQ is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SEIQ or VYM?
SEIQ has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SEIQ or VYM?
Over the past year SEIQ returned +7.54% vs +17.82% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SEIQ annualized +13.08% vs +13.36% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SEIQ or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 13.9% annualized versus 13.4% for SEIQ. Worst drawdown: SEIQ -14.9% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both SEIQ and VYM?
SEIQ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SEIQ and VYM?
32.6% of SEIQ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 20.3% of VYM's is in holdings SEIQ also owns. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in SEIQ and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, SEIQ or VYM?
SEIQ yields 0.63% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than SEIQ?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.