IVV vs SELV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs SEI QiM US Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SELV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.15% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $255M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.34% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 79 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +8.15% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +12.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +12.67% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 11.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -13.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 18, 2022 |
IVV vs SELV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and SEI QiM US Large Cap Low Volatility Active ETF (SELV) is a ETF from SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while SELV returned +12.23%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 8.15% for SELV.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +12.67% for SELV. Across the full 4-year window we track, SELV has the edge at +10.04% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.9% for SELV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -13.7% for SELV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SELV charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $15 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.34% for SELV.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SELV share 67 holdings out of 516 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SELV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SELV charges 0.15%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SELV?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +12.23% for SELV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +10.04% for SELV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SELV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.9% for SELV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SELV -13.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and SELV?
IVV and SELV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SELV?
IVV and SELV share 67 common holdings with a 19.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 516 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SELV?
IVV yields 1.09% while SELV yields 1.34%, so SELV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.