IVV vs TOV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy US ETF
Which is better, IVV or TOV?
Nearly the same fund. IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TOV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $282M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.83% |
| Holdings | 508 | 502 |
| YTD Return | +11.03% | +11.17%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.62%Best | +15.37% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.81% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.61% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3%Best | 13.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.2%Best | -16.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $13,014Best | $12,975 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 38.3% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | JLens |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 26, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 27, 2025 to Sep 16, 2026 (1.5 years).
IVV vs TOV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TOV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy US ETF (TOV) is an ETF from JLens. Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% while TOV returned +15.37%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.03% versus a gain of 11.17% for TOV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TOV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.8% compared with 13.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.2% for IVV and -16.3% for TOV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TOV charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $18 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.83% for TOV.
Holdings Overlap
95.8% of IVV's money is in holdings TOV also owns. 95.5% of TOV's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of IVV is already inside TOV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
404 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 496 in TOV, against full books of 508 and 502.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 83 positions for TOV that do not appear in our book for IVV (3.9% of the fund), and 79 for IVV that do not appear in TOV (2.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TOV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 7.84% | 0.23% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 6.91% | 0.11% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 5.68% | 0.01% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 5.01% | 2.01% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 3.78% | 0.06% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 2.56% | 0.09% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 1.87% | 0.03% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 1.59% | 0.04% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.56% | 1.58% | 0.02% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.44% | 1.44% | 0.00% |
95.8% of IVV is already inside TOV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TOV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TOV charges 0.18%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TOV?
Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% vs +15.37% for TOV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +19.20% vs +18.96% for TOV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TOV?
TOV has been the more volatile fund at 13.8% annualized versus 13.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -16.2% vs TOV -16.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and TOV?
IVV and TOV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TOV?
95.8% of IVV's money is in holdings TOV also owns. 95.5% of TOV's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 404 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 496 in TOV.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TOV?
IVV yields 1.06% while TOV yields 0.83%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TOV better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.