IVV vs TOV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy US ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TOV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $276M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.85% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 502 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +12.40% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +20.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -16.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | JLens | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 26, 2025 |
IVV vs TOV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy US ETF (TOV) is a ETF from JLens. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while TOV returned +20.87%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 12.40% for TOV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.9% for TOV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -16.3% for TOV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TOV charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $18 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.85% for TOV.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TOV share 408 holdings out of 593 unique holdings combined, representing a 89.8% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TOV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TOV charges 0.18%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TOV?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +20.87% for TOV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +20.89% for TOV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TOV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.9% for TOV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TOV -16.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and TOV?
IVV and TOV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TOV?
IVV and TOV share 408 common holdings with a 89.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 593 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TOV?
IVV yields 1.10% while TOV yields 0.85%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.