JSTC vs VOO

JSTC vs VOO

Which is better, JSTC or VOO?

VOO has been ahead.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. JSTC is less concentrated, with 11.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOLess Concentrated: JSTC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJSTCVOO
Expense Ratio0.89%0.03%Best
AUM$304M$997.4B
Dividend Yield1.22%1.08%
Holdings631509
YTD Return+12.06%+12.74%Best
1Y Return+13.65%+19.43%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+14.03%+21.18%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+6.11%+12.76%Best
Volatility (annualized)14.1%Best15.0%
Max Drawdown-26.8%-24.5%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$13,452$18,230Best
Top 10 Weight11.0%Best36.4%
Fund FamilyAdasina ETF Social CapitalVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 8, 2020Sep 7, 2010

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 10, 2020 to Sep 8, 2026 (5.7 years).

JSTC vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.7 years both funds cover.

JSTC vs VOO Performance

Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF (JSTC) is an ETF from Adasina ETF Social Capital and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year JSTC returned +13.65% while VOO returned +19.43%. Year to date, JSTC is up 12.06% versus a gain of 12.74% for VOO.

Over three years, JSTC compounded at +14.03% per year against +21.18% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +6.11% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +15.24% annualized vs +8.51%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.0% compared with 14.1% for JSTC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.8% for JSTC and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JSTC charges 0.89% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JSTC currently yields 1.22% against 1.08% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

JSTC already in VOO35.8%
VOO already in JSTC12.9%

35.8% of JSTC's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 12.9% of VOO's money is in holdings JSTC also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, JSTC as of Aug 18, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

84 positions in common, counted across the 617 positions we hold weights for in JSTC and 504 in VOO, against full books of 631 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 412 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for JSTC (86.5% of the fund), and 224 for JSTC that do not appear in VOO (22.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in JSTCWeight in VOODifference
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.07%1.47%0.40%
LRCXLam Research Corp1.48%0.84%0.64%
V'visa Inc., Class 'a''1.38%0.87%0.51%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc0.75%1.47%0.72%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.1.18%0.69%0.49%
MAMastercard Inc1.14%0.64%0.50%
INTCIntel Corp.0.45%1.02%0.57%
CMICummins Inc.0.99%0.15%0.84%
PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc - Common0.65%0.43%0.22%
SHWSherwin Williams Co0.88%0.12%0.76%

35.8% of JSTC is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

JSTCVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JSTC or VOO?

JSTC has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, JSTC or VOO?

Over the past year JSTC returned +13.65% vs +19.43% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), JSTC annualized +8.51% vs +15.24% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, JSTC or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 15.0% annualized versus 14.1% for JSTC. Worst drawdown: JSTC -26.8% vs VOO -24.5%.

Should I hold both JSTC and VOO?

JSTC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between JSTC and VOO?

35.8% of JSTC's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 12.9% of VOO's is in holdings JSTC also owns. They hold 84 positions in common, counted across the 617 positions we hold weights for in JSTC and 504 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, JSTC or VOO?

JSTC yields 1.22% while VOO yields 1.08%, so JSTC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than JSTC?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. JSTC is less concentrated, with 11.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.