NDOW vs QQQ
Anydrus Advantage ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, NDOW or QQQ?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. NDOW is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NDOW | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.11% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $65M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.19% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 88 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +4.11% | +16.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.49% | +22.98%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.39% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.6%Best | 17.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.8%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $11,782 | $16,135Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.8%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Anydrus Capital | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 14, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 14, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (2.3 years).
NDOW vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
NDOW vs QQQ Performance
Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) is an ETF from Anydrus Capital and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year NDOW returned +8.49% while QQQ returned +22.98%. Year to date, NDOW is up 4.11% versus a gain of 16.87% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 7.6% for NDOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.8% for NDOW and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NDOW charges 2.11% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $211 vs $18 annually, a gap of $193 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NDOW currently yields 1.19% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
14.8% of NDOW's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 38.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings NDOW also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in NDOW and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 88 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 81 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for NDOW (59.0% of the fund), and 54 for NDOW that do not appear in QQQ (69.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NDOW | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 2.20% | 8.44% | 6.24% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 1.22% | 5.76% | 4.54% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.59% | 4.43% | 2.84% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.26% | 4.67% | 3.41% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 1.16% | 3.13% | 1.97% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.77% | 3.16% | 2.39% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 0.52% | 2.78% | 2.26% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.87% | 1.86% | 0.99% |
| ASML:ASAsml Holding Adr Representing Nv | 1.55% | 0.68% | 0.87% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 0.56% | 1.37% | 0.81% |
38.7% of QQQ is already inside NDOW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NDOW or QQQ?
NDOW has an expense ratio of 2.11% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $193 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NDOW or QQQ?
Over the past year NDOW returned +8.49% vs +22.98% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NDOW annualized +7.39% vs +23.12% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NDOW or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 7.6% for NDOW. Worst drawdown: NDOW -8.8% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both NDOW and QQQ?
NDOW and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NDOW and QQQ?
38.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings NDOW also owns. 38.7% of QQQ's is in holdings NDOW also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in NDOW and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, NDOW or QQQ?
NDOW yields 1.19% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so NDOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than NDOW?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. NDOW is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.