NDOW vs VOO
Anydrus Advantage ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, NDOW or VOO?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NDOW | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.11% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $65M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.19% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 88 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +4.11% | +12.50%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.49% | +17.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.6%Best | 11.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.8%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $11,782 | $14,951Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.8% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Anydrus Capital | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 14, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 14, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (2.3 years).
NDOW vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
NDOW vs VOO Performance
Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) is an ETF from Anydrus Capital and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NDOW returned +8.49% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, NDOW is up 4.11% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.8% compared with 7.6% for NDOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.8% for NDOW and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NDOW charges 2.11% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $211 vs $3 annually, a gap of $208 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NDOW currently yields 1.19% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
33.5% of NDOW's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 35.4% of VOO's money is in holdings NDOW also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, NDOW as of Aug 17, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
45 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in NDOW and 505 in VOO, against full books of 88 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 451 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for NDOW (64.1% of the fund), and 23 for NDOW that do not appear in VOO (49.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NDOW | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 2.20% | 7.51% | 5.31% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 1.22% | 4.30% | 3.08% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.26% | 3.62% | 2.36% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 1.16% | 2.59% | 1.43% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.59% | 2.02% | 0.43% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.77% | 2.77% | 2.00% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 0.52% | 1.92% | 1.40% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 0.84% | 1.26% | 0.42% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.87% | 0.89% | 0.02% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.04% | 0.69% | 0.35% |
35.4% of VOO is already inside NDOW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NDOW or VOO?
NDOW has an expense ratio of 2.11% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $208 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NDOW or VOO?
Over the past year NDOW returned +8.49% vs +17.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NDOW annualized +7.39% vs +19.11% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NDOW or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 11.8% annualized versus 7.6% for NDOW. Worst drawdown: NDOW -8.8% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both NDOW and VOO?
NDOW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NDOW and VOO?
35.4% of VOO's money is in holdings NDOW also owns. 35.4% of VOO's is in holdings NDOW also owns. They hold 45 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in NDOW and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, NDOW or VOO?
NDOW yields 1.19% while VOO yields 1.04%, so NDOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than NDOW?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.