NPFE vs QQQ

NPFE vs QQQ

Which is better, NPFE or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. NPFE is less concentrated, with 44.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.9%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: NPFE

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNPFEQQQ
Expense Ratio0.40%0.18%Best
AUM$653M$437.3B
Dividend Yield0.30%0.43%
Holdings496208
YTD Return+12.88%Best+7.37%
1Y Return-+7.77%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.44%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.19%
Top 10 Weight44.8%Best46.9%
Fund FamilyNPF Investment AdvisorsInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMar 11, 2026Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

NPFE vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

NPFE vs QQQ Performance

NPF Core Equity ETF (NPFE) is an ETF from NPF Investment Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, NPFE is up 12.88% versus a gain of 7.37% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NPFE charges 0.40% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $18 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NPFE currently yields 0.30% against 0.43% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

NPFE already in QQQ33.3%
QQQ already in NPFE43.6%

33.3% of NPFE's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 43.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings NPFE also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

26 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in NPFE and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 496 and 208.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 70 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for NPFE (54.7% of the fund), and 94 for NPFE that do not appear in QQQ (63.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NPFEWeight in QQQDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp11.14%6.16%4.98%
NVDANvidia Corp3.61%8.05%4.44%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.86%4.23%0.37%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc4.33%3.15%1.18%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.39%3.37%1.98%
AMATApplied Material3.26%1.45%1.81%
LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares3.02%0.97%2.05%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc0.03%3.90%3.87%
AVGOBroadcom Inc0.06%2.52%2.46%
KLACKla Corp.1.39%0.97%0.42%

43.6% of QQQ is already inside NPFE.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

NPFEQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NPFE or QQQ?

NPFE has an expense ratio of 0.40% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between NPFE and QQQ?

43.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings NPFE also owns. 43.6% of QQQ's is in holdings NPFE also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 164 positions we hold weights for in NPFE and 101 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, NPFE or QQQ?

NPFE yields 0.30% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than NPFE?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. NPFE is less concentrated, with 44.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.