OALC vs SCHD
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, OALC or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. OALC led over 3Y and the full window, SCHD over 1Y. OALC is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OALC | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $261M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 244 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +14.91% | +24.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.81% | +28.14%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.24%Best | +15.58% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.90% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -26.8% | -16.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.8 years | $16,495Best | $15,230 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.3%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | OneAscent Investments | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 15, 2021 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2021 to Sep 10, 2026 (4.8 years).
OALC vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.8 years both funds cover.
OALC vs SCHD Performance
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) is an ETF from OneAscent Investments and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year OALC returned +19.81% while SCHD returned +28.14%. Year to date, OALC is up 14.91% versus a gain of 24.59% for SCHD.
Over three years, OALC compounded at +21.24% per year against +15.58% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OALC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 15.0% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.8% for OALC and -16.9% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OALC charges 0.49% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $6 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OALC currently yields 0.53% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
10.7% of OALC's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 65.7% of SCHD's money is in holdings OALC also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
21 positions in common, counted across the 211 positions we hold weights for in OALC and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 244 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 78 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for OALC (34.2% of the fund), and 189 for OALC that do not appear in SCHD (88.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OALC | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 1.09% | 4.77% | 3.68% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 1.11% | 4.17% | 3.06% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 0.55% | 4.69% | 4.14% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.44% | 4.70% | 4.26% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.88% | 3.88% | 3.00% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 0.74% | 4.02% | 3.28% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.88% | 3.83% | 2.95% |
| VZVerizon Communications, Inc. | 0.69% | 3.97% | 3.28% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.62% | 3.64% | 3.02% |
| COPConocophillips Co | 0.20% | 3.94% | 3.74% |
65.7% of SCHD is already inside OALC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OALC or SCHD?
OALC has an expense ratio of 0.49% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OALC or SCHD?
Over the past year OALC returned +19.81% vs +28.14% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OALC or SCHD?
OALC has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 15.0% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: OALC -26.8% vs SCHD -16.9%.
Should I hold both OALC and SCHD?
OALC and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between OALC and SCHD?
65.7% of SCHD's money is in holdings OALC also owns. 65.7% of SCHD's is in holdings OALC also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 211 positions we hold weights for in OALC and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, OALC or SCHD?
OALC yields 0.53% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than OALC?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. OALC led over 3Y and the full window, SCHD over 1Y. OALC is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.