PBPH vs VOO

PBPH vs VOO

Which is better, PBPH or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.8%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPBPHVOO
Expense Ratio0.13%0.03%Best
AUM$1.0B$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.08%1.04%
Holdings57509
YTD Return+12.09%+12.37%Best
1Y Return-+16.61%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.37%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.49%
Top 10 Weight61.8%37.6%Best
Fund FamilyPortfolio Building Block ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 24, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

PBPH vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

PBPH vs VOO Performance

Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH) is an ETF from Portfolio Building Block ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, PBPH is up 12.09% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PBPH charges 0.13% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $13 vs $3 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PBPH currently yields 0.08% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

PBPH already in VOO60.1%
VOO already in PBPH5.1%

60.1% of PBPH's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 5.1% of VOO's money is in holdings PBPH also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

15 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in PBPH and 494 in VOO, against full books of 57 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 472 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for PBPH (94.1% of the fund), and 14 for PBPH that do not appear in VOO (6.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PBPHWeight in VOODifference
LLYEli Lilly & Co.15.50%1.41%14.09%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common9.76%0.96%8.80%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.6.85%0.69%6.16%
MRKMerck & Company Inc5.00%0.50%4.50%
AMGNAmgen Inc.4.89%0.32%4.57%
GILDGilead Sciences3.97%0.25%3.72%
PFEPfizer Inc3.46%0.22%3.24%
BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co.3.01%0.21%2.80%
VRTXNvaesrtex Pharmaceuticals Inc2.98%0.19%2.79%
REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.1.81%0.12%1.69%

60.1% of PBPH is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

PBPHVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PBPH or VOO?

PBPH has an expense ratio of 0.13% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between PBPH and VOO?

60.1% of PBPH's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 5.1% of VOO's is in holdings PBPH also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in PBPH and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, PBPH or VOO?

PBPH yields 0.08% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than PBPH?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.