PJFG vs VOO
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, PJFG or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. PJFG led over the full window, VOO over 1Y and 3Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PJFG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $138M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 41 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +4.93% | +11.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.35% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.58% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 12.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.2% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.7 years | $22,908Best | $19,839 |
| Top 10 Weight | 61.3% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 14, 2022 to Sep 10, 2026 (3.7 years).
PJFG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.7 years both funds cover.
PJFG vs VOO Performance
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PJFG returned +7.35% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, PJFG is up 4.93% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Over three years, PJFG compounded at +20.58% per year against +20.71% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, PJFG has the edge at +25.11% annualized vs +20.34%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PJFG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 12.6% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.2% for PJFG and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PJFG charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PJFG currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
90.3% of PJFG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 42.9% of VOO's money is in holdings PJFG also owns.
Most of PJFG is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 64 days apart, PJFG as of Sep 2, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
30 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in PJFG and 505 in VOO, against full books of 41 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 466 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for PJFG (56.5% of the fund), and 5 for PJFG that do not appear in VOO (6.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PJFG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 12.29% | 7.51% | 4.78% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.52% | 6.59% | 0.93% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 9.33% | 3.25% | 6.08% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.98% | 4.30% | 1.68% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.79% | 3.62% | 2.17% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.99% | 2.77% | 2.22% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 4.53% | 1.47% | 3.06% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 3.27% | 1.92% | 1.35% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 3.42% | 1.47% | 1.95% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 3.94% | 0.64% | 3.30% |
90.3% of PJFG is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PJFG or VOO?
PJFG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PJFG or VOO?
Over the past year PJFG returned +7.35% vs +17.54% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), PJFG annualized +25.11% vs +20.34% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PJFG or VOO?
PJFG has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 12.6% for VOO. Worst drawdown: PJFG -24.2% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both PJFG and VOO?
PJFG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PJFG and VOO?
90.3% of PJFG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 42.9% of VOO's is in holdings PJFG also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in PJFG and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, PJFG or VOO?
PJFG yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than PJFG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. PJFG led over the full window, VOO over 1Y and 3Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.