QDPL vs QQQ
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QDPL offers more diversification with 519 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QDPL | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1.8B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.57% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 519 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +12.84% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.65% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.36% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.26% | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 12, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
QDPL vs QQQ Performance
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QDPL returned +20.65% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, QDPL is up 12.84% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, QDPL compounded at +20.36% per year against +26.64% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +12.26% and +15.36% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs +12.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.1% for QDPL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.6% for QDPL and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QDPL charges 0.60% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $18 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QDPL currently yields 4.57% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
QDPL and QQQ share 86 holdings out of 518 unique holdings combined, representing a 48.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QDPL or QQQ?
QDPL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QDPL or QQQ?
Over the past year QDPL returned +20.65% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QDPL annualized +12.54% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QDPL or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.1% for QDPL. Worst drawdown: QDPL -22.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both QDPL and QQQ?
QDPL and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QDPL and QQQ?
QDPL and QQQ share 86 common holdings with a 48.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 518 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QDPL or QQQ?
QDPL yields 4.57% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QDPL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.