QDPL vs VOO
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. QDPL offers more diversification with 519 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QDPL | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.8B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.57% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 519 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +10.61% | +12.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.03% | +20.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.15% | +20.90% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.61% | +12.59% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 12, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QDPL vs VOO Performance
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QDPL returned +19.03% while VOO returned +20.36%. Year to date, QDPL is up 10.61% versus a gain of 12.13% for VOO.
Over three years, QDPL compounded at +19.15% per year against +20.90% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.61% and +12.59% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.41% annualized vs +11.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.9% for QDPL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.6% for QDPL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QDPL charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QDPL currently yields 4.57% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QDPL and VOO share 482 holdings out of 527 unique holdings combined, representing a 88.7% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QDPL or VOO?
QDPL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QDPL or VOO?
Over the past year QDPL returned +19.03% vs +20.36% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QDPL annualized +11.97% vs +13.41% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QDPL or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.9% for QDPL. Worst drawdown: QDPL -22.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QDPL and VOO?
QDPL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QDPL and VOO?
QDPL and VOO share 482 common holdings with a 88.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 527 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QDPL or VOO?
QDPL yields 4.57% while VOO yields 1.08%, so QDPL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.