QDPL vs VOO
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QDPL or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. QDPL is less concentrated, with 34.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QDPL | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.8B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.62% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 519 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +12.61% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.47% | +17.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.17% | +23.04%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.56% | +13.63%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.9%Best | 15.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.6%Best | -24.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,068 | $18,944Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.8%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 12, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 13, 2021 to Sep 22, 2026 (5.2 years).
QDPL vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.2 years both funds cover.
QDPL vs VOO Performance
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QDPL returned +16.47% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, QDPL is up 12.61% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Over three years, QDPL compounded at +21.17% per year against +23.04% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +12.56% and +13.63% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 13.9% for QDPL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.6% for QDPL and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QDPL charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QDPL currently yields 4.62% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
90.2% of QDPL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 98.6% of VOO's money is in holdings QDPL also owns.
Most of VOO is already inside QDPL. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
472 positions in common, counted across the 500 positions we hold weights for in QDPL and 494 in VOO, against full books of 519 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 19 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for QDPL (0.7% of the fund), and 24 for QDPL that do not appear in VOO (8.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QDPL | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.68% | 7.55% | 0.13% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.47% | 7.05% | 0.58% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.11% | 5.36% | 0.25% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.48% | 4.13% | 0.65% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.73% | 3.24% | 0.51% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.33% | 2.86% | 0.53% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.18% | 2.62% | 0.44% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.86% | 1.90% | 0.04% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.58% | 1.44% | 0.14% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.32% | 1.46% | 0.14% |
98.6% of VOO is already inside QDPL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QDPL or VOO?
QDPL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QDPL or VOO?
Over the past year QDPL returned +16.47% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QDPL or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 13.9% for QDPL. Worst drawdown: QDPL -22.6% vs VOO -24.5%.
Should I hold both QDPL and VOO?
QDPL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QDPL and VOO?
98.6% of VOO's money is in holdings QDPL also owns. 98.6% of VOO's is in holdings QDPL also owns. They hold 472 positions in common, counted across the 500 positions we hold weights for in QDPL and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, QDPL or VOO?
QDPL yields 4.62% while VOO yields 1.04%, so QDPL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than QDPL?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. QDPL is less concentrated, with 34.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.