QDPL vs VYM
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, QDPL or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QDPL led over 3Y and 5Y, VYM over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QDPL | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $1.9B | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.53% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 1,038 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +10.65% | +13.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.50% | +17.41%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.11%Best | +20.15% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.39%Best | +11.38% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8%Tie | 13.8%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -22.6% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,149Best | $17,141 |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.9% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 12, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 13, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026 (5.3 years).
QDPL vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
QDPL vs VYM Performance
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QDPL returned +13.50% while VYM returned +17.41%. Year to date, QDPL is up 10.65% versus a gain of 13.54% for VYM.
Over three years, QDPL compounded at +21.11% per year against +20.15% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.39% and +11.38% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QDPL and VYM have been equally volatile, both at 13.8% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.6% for QDPL and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QDPL charges 0.60% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $4 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QDPL currently yields 4.53% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
31.2% of QDPL's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 91.0% of VYM's money is in holdings QDPL also owns.
Most of VYM is already inside QDPL. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
247 positions in common, counted across the 498 positions we hold weights for in QDPL and 602 in VYM, against full books of 1,038 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 330 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for QDPL (7.7% of the fund), and 247 for QDPL that do not appear in VYM (67.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QDPL | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.27% | 6.94% | 4.67% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.31% | 3.83% | 2.52% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 0.95% | 2.70% | 1.75% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.89% | 2.58% | 1.69% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.64% | 1.83% | 1.19% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.61% | 1.76% | 1.15% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.54% | 1.65% | 1.11% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.55% | 1.54% | 0.99% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.50% | 1.47% | 0.97% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.50% | 1.46% | 0.96% |
91.0% of VYM is already inside QDPL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QDPL or VYM?
QDPL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QDPL or VYM?
Over the past year QDPL returned +13.50% vs +17.41% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QDPL or VYM?
QDPL and VYM have been equally volatile, both at 13.8% annualized. Worst drawdown: QDPL -22.6% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both QDPL and VYM?
QDPL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QDPL and VYM?
91.0% of VYM's money is in holdings QDPL also owns. 91.0% of VYM's is in holdings QDPL also owns. They hold 247 positions in common, counted across the 498 positions we hold weights for in QDPL and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, QDPL or VYM?
QDPL yields 4.53% while VYM yields 2.37%, so QDPL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than QDPL?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QDPL led over 3Y and 5Y, VYM over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.