QDPL vs VYM
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QDPL | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $1.8B | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.57% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 519 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +12.12% | +14.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.36% | +21.14% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.17% | +18.69% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.99% | +12.00% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 12, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QDPL vs VYM Performance
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QDPL returned +19.36% while VYM returned +21.14%. Year to date, QDPL is up 12.12% versus a gain of 14.95% for VYM.
Over three years, QDPL compounded at +20.17% per year against +18.69% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.99% and +12.00% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QDPL has the edge at +12.30% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 14.0% for QDPL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.6% for QDPL and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QDPL charges 0.60% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $4 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QDPL currently yields 4.57% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
QDPL and VYM share 240 holdings out of 865 unique holdings combined, representing a 30.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QDPL or VYM?
QDPL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QDPL or VYM?
Over the past year QDPL returned +19.36% vs +21.14% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QDPL annualized +12.30% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QDPL or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 14.0% for QDPL. Worst drawdown: QDPL -22.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both QDPL and VYM?
QDPL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QDPL and VYM?
QDPL and VYM share 240 common holdings with a 30.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 865 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QDPL or VYM?
QDPL yields 4.57% while VYM yields 2.24%, so QDPL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.