QQXT vs VOO
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QQXT or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQXT is less concentrated, with 22.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQXT | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $152M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.20% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 110 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -1.87% | +12.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.33% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.23% | +21.37%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.15% | +13.49%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -30.4%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,677 | $18,827Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.9%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 8, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 18, 2026 (16 years).
QQXT vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
QQXT vs VOO Performance
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQXT returned -0.33% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, QQXT is down 1.87% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Over three years, QQXT compounded at +6.23% per year against +21.37% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +3.15% and +13.49% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.39% annualized vs +11.24%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQXT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.4% for QQXT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQXT charges 0.57% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $3 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQXT currently yields 1.20% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
85.9% of QQXT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 13.1% of VOO's money is in holdings QQXT also owns.
Most of QQXT is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
46 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in QQXT and 494 in VOO, against full books of 110 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 441 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for QQXT (86.1% of the fund), and 6 for QQXT that do not appear in VOO (10.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQXT | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.74% | 4.13% | 2.39% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.53% | 1.36% | 0.17% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 2.31% | 0.32% | 1.99% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 2.49% | 0.10% | 2.39% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 2.34% | 0.17% | 2.17% |
| REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 2.36% | 0.12% | 2.24% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 1.79% | 0.66% | 1.13% |
| PAYXPaychex, Inc. | 2.38% | 0.06% | 2.32% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.64% | 0.76% | 0.88% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 2.15% | 0.23% | 1.92% |
85.9% of QQXT is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQXT or VOO?
QQXT has an expense ratio of 0.57% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQXT or VOO?
Over the past year QQXT returned -0.33% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), QQXT annualized +11.24% vs +13.39% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQXT or VOO?
QQXT has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QQXT -30.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QQXT and VOO?
QQXT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQXT and VOO?
85.9% of QQXT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 13.1% of VOO's is in holdings QQXT also owns. They hold 46 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in QQXT and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQXT or VOO?
QQXT yields 1.20% while VOO yields 1.04%, so QQXT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than QQXT?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQXT is less concentrated, with 22.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.