QQXT vs VTI
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQXT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $154M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 58 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +4.69% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.28% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.55% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.27% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 8, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
QQXT vs VTI Performance
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQXT returned +6.28% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, QQXT is up 4.69% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, QQXT compounded at +7.55% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.27% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, QQXT has the edge at +9.04% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQXT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.5% for QQXT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQXT charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQXT currently yields 1.22% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QQXT and VTI share 49 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQXT or VTI?
QQXT has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQXT or VTI?
Over the past year QQXT returned +6.28% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), QQXT annualized +9.04% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQXT or VTI?
QQXT has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QQXT -57.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QQXT and VTI?
QQXT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QQXT and VTI?
QQXT and VTI share 49 common holdings with a 10.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQXT or VTI?
QQXT yields 1.22% while VTI yields 1.07%, so QQXT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.