RVRB vs VTI
Reverb ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RVRB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $5M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.86% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 499 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -5.46% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.03% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.00% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Reverb ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 3, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
RVRB vs VTI Performance
Reverb ETF (RVRB) is a ETF from Reverb ETF and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RVRB returned +14.03% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, RVRB is down 5.46% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, RVRB compounded at +19.00% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, RVRB has the edge at +17.33% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.9% for RVRB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for RVRB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RVRB charges 0.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RVRB currently yields 0.86% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RVRB and VTI share 410 holdings out of 2870 unique holdings combined, representing a 75.8% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RVRB or VTI?
RVRB has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RVRB or VTI?
Over the past year RVRB returned +14.03% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), RVRB annualized +17.33% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RVRB or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.9% for RVRB. Worst drawdown: RVRB -19.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RVRB and VTI?
RVRB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between RVRB and VTI?
RVRB and VTI share 410 common holdings with a 75.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2870 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RVRB or VTI?
RVRB yields 0.86% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.