RVRB vs VOO
Reverb ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RVRB | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $5M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.86% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 499 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -5.46% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.03% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.00% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Reverb ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 3, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RVRB vs VOO Performance
Reverb ETF (RVRB) is a ETF from Reverb ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RVRB returned +14.03% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, RVRB is down 5.46% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, RVRB compounded at +19.00% per year against +22.06% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, RVRB has the edge at +17.33% annualized vs +13.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 12.9% for RVRB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for RVRB and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RVRB charges 0.30% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RVRB currently yields 0.86% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RVRB and VOO share 403 holdings out of 595 unique holdings combined, representing a 81.7% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RVRB or VOO?
RVRB has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RVRB or VOO?
Over the past year RVRB returned +14.03% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), RVRB annualized +17.33% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RVRB or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 12.9% for RVRB. Worst drawdown: RVRB -19.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RVRB and VOO?
RVRB and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between RVRB and VOO?
RVRB and VOO share 403 common holdings with a 81.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 595 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RVRB or VOO?
RVRB yields 0.86% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.