SEIQ vs VOO
SEI QiM US Large Cap Quality Active ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SEIQ or VOO?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SEIQ | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $729M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.63% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 64 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +5.32% | +11.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.54% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.22% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.4%Best | 15.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.9%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 4.3 years | $16,965 | $20,486Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.1% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 18, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 18, 2022 to Sep 10, 2026 (4.3 years).
SEIQ vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.3 years both funds cover.
SEIQ vs VOO Performance
SEI QiM US Large Cap Quality Active ETF (SEIQ) is an ETF from SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SEIQ returned +7.54% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, SEIQ is up 5.32% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Over three years, SEIQ compounded at +13.22% per year against +20.71% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +18.15% annualized vs +13.08%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.4% for SEIQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.9% for SEIQ and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SEIQ charges 0.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SEIQ currently yields 0.63% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
95.7% of SEIQ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 39.6% of VOO's money is in holdings SEIQ also owns.
Most of SEIQ is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, SEIQ as of Aug 18, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
57 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in SEIQ and 505 in VOO, against full books of 64 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 439 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SEIQ (59.9% of the fund), and 6 for SEIQ that do not appear in VOO (4.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SEIQ | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.15% | 7.51% | 0.36% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.27% | 6.59% | 0.68% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 7.16% | 4.30% | 2.86% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.63% | 2.59% | 0.04% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 3.84% | 0.95% | 2.89% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.59% | 3.62% | 3.03% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 3.25% | 0.72% | 2.53% |
| VVisa Inc | 2.98% | 0.87% | 2.11% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.75% | 0.64% | 2.11% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.34% | 2.77% | 2.43% |
95.7% of SEIQ is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SEIQ or VOO?
SEIQ has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SEIQ or VOO?
Over the past year SEIQ returned +7.54% vs +17.54% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SEIQ annualized +13.08% vs +18.15% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SEIQ or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.4% for SEIQ. Worst drawdown: SEIQ -14.9% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both SEIQ and VOO?
SEIQ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SEIQ and VOO?
95.7% of SEIQ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 39.6% of VOO's is in holdings SEIQ also owns. They hold 57 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in SEIQ and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, SEIQ or VOO?
SEIQ yields 0.63% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SEIQ?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.