SFGV vs SPY
Sequoia Global Value ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Which is better, SFGV or SPY?
Each has led over a different period.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SFGV led over 1Y, SPY over the full window. SPY is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SFGV | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33% | 0.09%Best |
| AUM | $1.2B | $804.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.29% | 0.98% |
| Holdings | 527 | 505 |
| YTD Return | +13.62%Best | +12.09% |
| 1Y Return | +18.01%Best | +16.29% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.20% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8%Best | 12.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.2%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $15,020 | $16,571Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.0% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | EA Series Trust | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 16, 2024 | Jan 22, 1993 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 18, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.7 years).
SFGV vs SPY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
SFGV vs SPY Performance
Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) is an ETF from EA Series Trust and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year SFGV returned +18.01% while SPY returned +16.29%. Year to date, SFGV is up 13.62% versus a gain of 12.09% for SPY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.0% compared with 10.8% for SFGV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.2% for SFGV and -18.8% for SPY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SFGV charges 0.33% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $9 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SFGV currently yields 2.29% against 0.98% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
49.3% of SFGV's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 33.0% of SPY's money is in holdings SFGV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
179 positions in common, counted across the 527 positions we hold weights for in SFGV and 504 in SPY, against full books of 527 and 505.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 318 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for SFGV (66.3% of the fund), and 328 for SFGV that do not appear in SPY (50.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SFGV | Weight in SPY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.84% | 7.26% | 5.42% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.41% | 1.04% | 0.37% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.42% | 0.99% | 0.43% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.56% | 1.45% | 0.89% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 1.08% | 0.60% | 0.48% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.55% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.96% | 0.66% | 0.30% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 1.00% | 0.52% | 0.48% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.94% | 0.55% | 0.39% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.96% | 0.52% | 0.44% |
49.3% of SFGV is already inside SPY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SFGV or SPY?
SFGV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SFGV or SPY?
Over the past year SFGV returned +18.01% vs +16.29% for SPY, so SFGV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SFGV or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 12.0% annualized versus 10.8% for SFGV. Worst drawdown: SFGV -15.2% vs SPY -18.8%.
Should I hold both SFGV and SPY?
SFGV and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SFGV and SPY?
49.3% of SFGV's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 33.0% of SPY's is in holdings SFGV also owns. They hold 179 positions in common, counted across the 527 positions we hold weights for in SFGV and 504 in SPY.
Which pays a higher dividend, SFGV or SPY?
SFGV yields 2.29% while SPY yields 0.98%, so SFGV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPY better than SFGV?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SFGV led over 1Y, SPY over the full window. SPY is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.