SFGV vs VTI
Sequoia Global Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SFGV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SFGV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.2B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.34% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 527 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +16.40% | +12.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.89% | +20.47% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | EA Series Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 16, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
SFGV vs VTI Performance
Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) is a ETF from EA Series Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SFGV returned +22.89% while VTI returned +20.47%. Year to date, SFGV is up 16.40% versus a gain of 12.79% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 10.8% for SFGV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.2% for SFGV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SFGV charges 0.33% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $3 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SFGV currently yields 2.34% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SFGV and VTI share 408 holdings out of 2905 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SFGV or VTI?
SFGV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SFGV or VTI?
Over the past year SFGV returned +22.89% vs +20.47% for VTI, so SFGV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), SFGV annualized +17.81% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SFGV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 10.8% for SFGV. Worst drawdown: SFGV -15.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SFGV and VTI?
SFGV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SFGV and VTI?
SFGV and VTI share 408 common holdings with a 22.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2905 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SFGV or VTI?
SFGV yields 2.34% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SFGV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.