SROI vs VTI
Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SROI | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $19M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.55% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 126 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.54% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.34% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.56% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Calamos Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
SROI vs VTI Performance
Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) is a ETF from Calamos Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SROI returned +19.34% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, SROI is up 12.54% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, SROI compounded at +15.56% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, SROI has the edge at +13.48% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.3% for SROI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.9% for SROI and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SROI charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SROI currently yields 0.55% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SROI and VTI share 56 holdings out of 2850 unique holdings combined, representing a 30.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SROI or VTI?
SROI has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SROI or VTI?
Over the past year SROI returned +19.34% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SROI annualized +13.48% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SROI or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.3% for SROI. Worst drawdown: SROI -15.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SROI and VTI?
SROI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between SROI and VTI?
SROI and VTI share 56 common holdings with a 30.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2850 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SROI or VTI?
SROI yields 0.55% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.