SROI vs VOO
Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SROI | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $19M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.55% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 126 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +11.96% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.36% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.29% | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Calamos Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SROI vs VOO Performance
Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) is a ETF from Calamos Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SROI returned +17.36% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, SROI is up 11.96% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Over three years, SROI compounded at +15.29% per year against +22.09% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.50% annualized vs +13.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 12.3% for SROI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.9% for SROI and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SROI charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SROI currently yields 0.55% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SROI and VOO share 55 holdings out of 569 unique holdings combined, representing a 32.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SROI or VOO?
SROI has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SROI or VOO?
Over the past year SROI returned +17.36% vs +20.69% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SROI annualized +13.35% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SROI or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 12.3% for SROI. Worst drawdown: SROI -15.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SROI and VOO?
SROI and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between SROI and VOO?
SROI and VOO share 55 common holdings with a 32.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 569 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SROI or VOO?
SROI yields 0.55% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.