Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTIMEVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.96%0.03%
AUM$15M$663.5B
Dividend Yield16.47%1.07%
Holdings393,543
YTD Return+8.90%+14.20%
1Y Return+15.17%+24.16%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.55%+21.12%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.37%
Volatility (annualized)24.6%15.3%
Max Drawdown-42.2%-56.6%
Fund FamilyClockwise CapitalVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJan 27, 2022May 24, 2001

TIME vs VTI Performance

Clockwise US Core Equity ETF (TIME) is a ETF from Clockwise Capital and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TIME returned +15.17% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, TIME is up 8.90% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.

Over three years, TIME compounded at +16.55% per year against +21.12% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +8.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TIME has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.2% for TIME and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TIME charges 0.96% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $96 vs $3 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TIME currently yields 16.47% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

37.8%overlap

TIME and VTI share 37 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 37.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in TIMEWeight in VTIDifference
AAPL10.34%5.84%4.50%
NVDA9.77%6.32%3.45%
GOOGL7.00%2.88%4.12%
MSFTProProPro
AMZNProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
MUProProPro
AMGNProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See all 10 holdings TIME shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$99/yr Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TIME or VTI?

TIME has an expense ratio of 0.96% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $93 per year of difference.

Which performed better, TIME or VTI?

Over the past year TIME returned +15.17% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), TIME annualized +8.10% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, TIME or VTI?

TIME has been the more volatile fund at 24.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: TIME -42.2% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both TIME and VTI?

TIME and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between TIME and VTI?

TIME and VTI share 37 common holdings with a 37.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, TIME or VTI?

TIME yields 16.47% while VTI yields 1.07%, so TIME currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.