TRUF vs VOO
VanEck Financials TruSector ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, TRUF or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 81.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TRUF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $591,232.77 | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.35% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 23 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +11.18% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.31% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.63% |
| Top 10 Weight | 81.8% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 1, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
TRUF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
TRUF vs VOO Performance
VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, TRUF is up 11.18% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TRUF charges 0.10% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $3 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TRUF currently yields 0.35% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
39.5% of TRUF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 12.3% of VOO's money is in holdings TRUF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
73 positions in common, counted across the 78 positions we hold weights for in TRUF and 494 in VOO, against full books of 23 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 78 and 494 positions we hold weights for.
VOO holds 414 positions TRUF does not, 86.9% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.55%, AAPL 7.05%, MSFT 5.36%, AMZN 4.13%, GOOGL 3.24%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TRUF | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.70% | 1.46% | 3.24% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 4.55% | 1.46% | 3.09% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 3.06% | 0.93% | 2.13% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.34% | 0.72% | 1.62% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 2.02% | 0.63% | 1.39% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 1.51% | 0.45% | 1.06% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 1.33% | 0.41% | 0.92% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 1.24% | 0.39% | 0.85% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 1.13% | 0.34% | 0.79% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 0.89% | 0.27% | 0.62% |
39.5% of TRUF is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TRUF or VOO?
TRUF has an expense ratio of 0.10% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between TRUF and VOO?
39.5% of TRUF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 12.3% of VOO's is in holdings TRUF also owns. They hold 73 positions in common, counted across the 78 positions we hold weights for in TRUF and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, TRUF or VOO?
TRUF yields 0.35% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than TRUF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 81.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.