VONG vs VTV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF
Quick Verdict
VTV has a lower expense ratio. VTV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VONG offers more diversification with 373 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VONG | VTV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $51.6B | $187.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 1.85% | |
| Holdings | 373 | 311 | |
| YTD Return | +3.62% | +18.02% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.38% | +26.57% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.29% | +19.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.29% | +12.56% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.7% | -61.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2010 | Jan 26, 2004 |
VONG vs VTV Performance
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF (VTV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VONG returned +11.38% while VTV returned +26.57%. Year to date, VONG is up 3.62% versus a gain of 18.02% for VTV.
Over three years, VONG compounded at +22.29% per year against +19.29% for VTV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.29% and +12.56% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VONG has the edge at +15.60% annualized vs +7.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VONG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 14.5% for VTV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.7% for VONG and -61.3% for VTV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VONG charges 0.06% per year while VTV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VONG currently yields 0.48% against 1.85% for VTV.
Holdings Overlap
VONG and VTV share 77 holdings out of 602 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VONG or VTV?
VONG has an expense ratio of 0.06% while VTV charges 0.03%. VTV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VONG or VTV?
Over the past year VONG returned +11.38% vs +26.57% for VTV, so VTV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VONG annualized +15.60% vs +7.59% for VTV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VONG or VTV?
VONG has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 14.5% for VTV. Worst drawdown: VONG -32.7% vs VTV -61.3%.
Should I hold both VONG and VTV?
VONG and VTV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VONG and VTV?
VONG and VTV share 77 common holdings with a 13.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 602 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VONG or VTV?
VONG yields 0.48% while VTV yields 1.85%, so VTV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.