VTI vs XVOL
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Acruence Active Hedge US Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | XVOL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.83% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $2M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 2.00% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 83 | |
| YTD Return | +13.14% | +1.47% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.35% | +20.04% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.83% | +9.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.01% | +4.79% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 16.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -25.8% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Acruence Capital, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Apr 21, 2021 |
VTI vs XVOL Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Acruence Active Hedge US Equity ETF (XVOL) is a ETF from Acruence Capital, LLC. Over the past year VTI returned +22.35% while XVOL returned +20.04%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.14% versus a gain of 1.47% for XVOL.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.83% per year against +9.96% for XVOL; over five years the annualized figures are +12.01% and +4.79% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XVOL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -25.8% for XVOL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while XVOL charges 0.83%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $83 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 2.00% for XVOL.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and XVOL share 75 holdings out of 2793 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or XVOL?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XVOL charges 0.83%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $80 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or XVOL?
Over the past year VTI returned +22.35% vs +20.04% for XVOL, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), VTI annualized +8.09% vs +4.79% for XVOL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or XVOL?
XVOL has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs XVOL -25.8%.
Should I hold both VTI and XVOL?
VTI and XVOL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and XVOL?
VTI and XVOL share 75 common holdings with a 21.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2793 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XVOL?
VTI yields 1.07% while XVOL yields 2.00%, so XVOL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.