ABFL vs AVUC

ABFL vs AVUC

Which is better, ABFL or AVUC?

AVUC costs less.

AVUC has a lower expense ratio. ABFL is less concentrated, with 36.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.

Lower Fees: AVUCLess Concentrated: ABFL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricABFLAVUC
Expense Ratio0.49%0.17%Best
AUM$450M-
Dividend Yield0.60%0.00%
Holdings1701,568
YTD Return+7.64%Best-0.65%
1Y Return+9.64%-
3Y Return (annualized)+13.87%-
5Y Return (annualized)+8.34%-
Top 10 Weight36.0%Best36.4%
Fund FamilyFCF AdvisorsAvantis Investors
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 27, 2016Oct 13, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ABFL vs AVUC growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare ABFL against instead:ABFL vs SPYABFL vs QQQABFL vs VOOABFL vs VTIAVUC against:AVUC vs VXUS

ABFL vs AVUC Performance

Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) is an ETF from FCF Advisors and Avantis US Core Equity ETF (AVUC) is an ETF from Avantis Investors. Year to date, ABFL is up 7.64% versus a loss of 0.65% for AVUC.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ABFL charges 0.49% per year while AVUC charges 0.17%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $17 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABFL currently yields 0.60% against 0.00% for AVUC.

Holdings Overlap

ABFL already in AVUC96.5%
AVUC already in ABFL18.9%

96.5% of ABFL's money is in holdings AVUC also owns. 18.9% of AVUC's money is in holdings ABFL also owns.

Most of ABFL is already inside AVUC. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

52 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in ABFL and 1,568 in AVUC, against full books of 170 and 1,568.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 514 positions for AVUC that do not appear in our book for ABFL (77.6% of the fund), and 2 for ABFL that do not appear in AVUC (3.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ABFLWeight in AVUCDifference
AAPLApple, Inc5.88%5.32%0.56%
NVDANvidia Corp.4.77%3.91%0.86%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.3.74%1.24%2.50%
MAMastercard Inc3.03%1.44%1.59%
VVisa Inc2.70%1.10%1.60%
GEVGe Vernova3.56%0.22%3.34%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.3.43%0.34%3.09%
GILDGilead Sciences Inc3.41%0.15%3.26%
MOAltria Group Inc.2.70%0.27%2.43%
BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co.2.82%0.06%2.76%

96.5% of ABFL is already inside AVUC.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ABFLAVUC

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ABFL or AVUC?

ABFL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while AVUC charges 0.17%. AVUC is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ABFL and AVUC?

96.5% of ABFL's money is in holdings AVUC also owns. 18.9% of AVUC's is in holdings ABFL also owns. They hold 52 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in ABFL and 1,568 in AVUC.

Which pays a higher dividend, ABFL or AVUC?

ABFL yields 0.60% while AVUC yields 0.00%, so ABFL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is AVUC better than ABFL?

AVUC has a lower expense ratio. ABFL is less concentrated, with 36.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.