ACIV vs IVV
Hartford Alpha Capture International Value ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ACIV or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ACIV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIV | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $97M | $850.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% |
| Holdings | 179 | 1,018 |
| YTD Return | -1.04% | +8.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +10.97% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.51% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.97% |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 29, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ACIV vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACIV vs IVV Performance
Hartford Alpha Capture International Value ETF (ACIV) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ACIV is down 1.04% versus a gain of 8.54% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIV charges 0.56% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIV currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 17.1% of IVV's money is in holdings ACIV also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ACIV, our book for it covers 91.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and ACIV share little of their money.
23 positions in common, counted across the 179 positions we hold weights for in ACIV and 505 in IVV, against full books of 179 and 1,018.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACIV | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.53% | 5.95% | 4.42% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 1.52% | 3.06% | 1.54% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.34% | 3.74% | 3.40% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.49% | 1.55% | 1.06% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 0.55% | 0.31% | 0.24% |
| CBChubb Ltd. | 0.62% | 0.18% | 0.44% |
| DEDeere & Co Sedol 2261203 | 0.55% | 0.25% | 0.30% |
| CATCaterpillar Inc | 0.25% | 0.52% | 0.27% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 0.48% | 0.25% | 0.23% |
| FERGFerguson Enterprises | 0.53% | 0.06% | 0.47% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACIV and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIV or IVV?
ACIV has an expense ratio of 0.56% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ACIV and IVV?
At least 17.1% of IVV's money is in holdings ACIV also owns. Our book for ACIV is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 179 positions we hold weights for in ACIV and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIV or IVV?
ACIV yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ACIV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ACIV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.