ACIV vs VTI
Hartford Alpha Capture International Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ACIV or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ACIV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $97M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 179 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | -1.04% | +8.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +11.14% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.84% |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 29, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ACIV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACIV vs VTI Performance
Hartford Alpha Capture International Value ETF (ACIV) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, ACIV is down 1.04% versus a gain of 8.54% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIV charges 0.56% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIV currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 15.8% of VTI's money is in holdings ACIV also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ACIV, our book for it covers 91.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and ACIV share little of their money.
31 positions in common, counted across the 179 positions we hold weights for in ACIV and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 179 and 3,542.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACIV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.53% | 5.19% | 3.66% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 1.52% | 2.76% | 1.24% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.34% | 3.30% | 2.96% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.49% | 1.64% | 1.15% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 0.55% | 0.28% | 0.27% |
| DEDeere & Co Sedol 2261203 | 0.55% | 0.23% | 0.32% |
| CBChubb Ltd. | 0.62% | 0.15% | 0.47% |
| CATCaterpillar Inc | 0.25% | 0.51% | 0.26% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 0.48% | 0.22% | 0.26% |
| CLHClean Harbors Inc | 0.65% | 0.02% | 0.63% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACIV and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIV or VTI?
ACIV has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ACIV and VTI?
At least 15.8% of VTI's money is in holdings ACIV also owns. Our book for ACIV is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 179 positions we hold weights for in ACIV and 3,464 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIV or VTI?
ACIV yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ACIV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ACIV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.