ALRG vs NUDG
Allspring LT Large Core ETF vs Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF
Which is better, ALRG or NUDG?
ALRG has been ahead.
ALRG has a lower expense ratio. ALRG led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ALRG | NUDG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28%Best | 0.61% |
| AUM | $8M | $5.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.48% |
| Holdings | 104 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +13.29%Best | +4.96% |
| 1Y Return | +13.86% | - |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Nuveen |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 8, 2025 | Jun 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ALRG vs NUDG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ALRG vs NUDG Performance
Allspring LT Large Core ETF (ALRG) is an ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF (NUDG) is an ETF from Nuveen. Year to date, ALRG is up 13.29% versus a gain of 4.96% for NUDG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ALRG charges 0.28% per year while NUDG charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $61 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ALRG currently yields 0.42% against 0.48% for NUDG.
Holdings Overlap
At least 42.2% of ALRG's money is in holdings NUDG also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NUDG, our book for it covers 94.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ALRG and 41 in NUDG, against full books of 104 and 43.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ALRG | Weight in NUDG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.79% | 7.58% | 0.21% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 8.81% | 6.53% | 2.28% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 5.53% | 3.63% | 1.90% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.83% | 4.72% | 0.89% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 2.59% | 3.38% | 0.79% |
| ETNEaton Corporation Plc Ordinary Shares | 1.30% | 2.38% | 1.08% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.77% | 1.90% | 0.13% |
| BLKBlackrock Inc Cl A Com | 1.30% | 2.05% | 0.75% |
| ADIAnalog Devices | 1.32% | 1.90% | 0.58% |
| MSIMotorola Solutions, Inc | 1.22% | 2.00% | 0.78% |
42.2% of ALRG is already inside NUDG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ALRG or NUDG?
ALRG has an expense ratio of 0.28% while NUDG charges 0.61%. ALRG is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ALRG and NUDG?
At least 42.2% of ALRG's money is in holdings NUDG also owns. Our book for NUDG is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ALRG and 41 in NUDG.
Which pays a higher dividend, ALRG or NUDG?
ALRG yields 0.42% while NUDG yields 0.48%, so NUDG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NUDG better than ALRG?
ALRG has a lower expense ratio. ALRG led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.