AVTM vs TILT

AVTM vs TILT

Which is better, AVTM or TILT?

AVTM costs less.

AVTM has a lower expense ratio. TILT is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.3%.

Lower Fees: AVTMLess Concentrated: TILT

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAVTMTILT
Expense Ratio0.22%Best0.25%
AUM-$2.2B
Dividend Yield-1.05%
Holdings3,3991,929
YTD Return+11.82%+12.99%Best
1Y Return-+17.27%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.33%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.78%
Top 10 Weight40.3%25.8%Best
Fund FamilyAvantis InvestorsNorthern Trust Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 29, 2026Sep 16, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AVTM vs TILT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare AVTM against instead:AVTM vs SPYAVTM vs QQQAVTM vs VOOAVTM vs VTITILT against:TILT vs VXUS

AVTM vs TILT Performance

Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM) is an ETF from Avantis Investors and Northern Trust Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt ETF (TILT) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management. Year to date, AVTM is up 11.82% versus a gain of 12.99% for TILT.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AVTM charges 0.22% per year while TILT charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $22 vs $25 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period.

Holdings Overlap

AVTM already in TILT76.0%
TILT already in AVTM76.4%

76.0% of AVTM's money is in holdings TILT also owns. 76.4% of TILT's money is in holdings AVTM also owns.

Most of TILT is already inside AVTM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

818 positions in common, counted across the 947 positions we hold weights for in AVTM and 1,894 in TILT, against full books of 3,399 and 1,929.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 777 positions for TILT that do not appear in our book for AVTM (20.8% of the fund), and 26 for AVTM that do not appear in TILT (19.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AVTMWeight in TILTDifference
NVDANvidia Corp5.68%4.98%0.70%
AAPLApple, Inc4.67%4.91%0.24%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.29%3.77%0.48%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.17%2.50%0.33%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C2.36%1.63%0.73%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.10%1.82%0.28%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A1.17%2.05%0.88%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.46%1.30%0.16%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.06%1.61%0.55%
JPMJpmorgan Chase1.41%1.18%0.23%

76.4% of TILT is already inside AVTM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AVTMTILT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AVTM or TILT?

AVTM has an expense ratio of 0.22% while TILT charges 0.25%. AVTM is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AVTM and TILT?

76.4% of TILT's money is in holdings AVTM also owns. 76.4% of TILT's is in holdings AVTM also owns. They hold 818 positions in common, counted across the 947 positions we hold weights for in AVTM and 1,894 in TILT.

Is TILT better than AVTM?

AVTM has a lower expense ratio. TILT is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.