BLCV vs MFSV
iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF vs MFS Active Value ETF
Which is better, BLCV or MFSV?
BLCV has been ahead.
MFSV has a lower expense ratio. BLCV led over 1Y and the full window. MFSV is less concentrated, with 32.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLCV | MFSV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.44%Best |
| AUM | $339M | $590M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.21% | 1.32% |
| Holdings | 56 | 64 |
| YTD Return | +13.18%Best | +9.55% |
| 1Y Return | +21.62%Best | +14.44% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.28% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5% | 9.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -12.6%Best | -12.7% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $13,054Best | $12,027 |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.1% | 32.9%Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | MFS Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 19, 2023 | Dec 5, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 5, 2024 to Oct 12, 2026 (1.9 years).
BLCV vs MFSV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
BLCV vs MFSV Performance
iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF (BLCV) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management. Over the past year BLCV returned +21.62% while MFSV returned +14.44%. Year to date, BLCV is up 13.18% versus a gain of 9.55% for MFSV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BLCV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.5% compared with 9.6% for MFSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.6% for BLCV and -12.7% for MFSV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLCV charges 0.45% per year while MFSV charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $44 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLCV currently yields 1.21% against 1.32% for MFSV.
Holdings Overlap
38.8% of BLCV's money is in holdings MFSV also owns. 27.7% of MFSV's money is in holdings BLCV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in BLCV and 60 in MFSV, against full books of 56 and 64.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 45 positions for MFSV that do not appear in our book for BLCV (68.4% of the fund), and 41 for BLCV that do not appear in MFSV (58.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BLCV | Weight in MFSV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.30% | 5.35% | 2.95% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.80% | 5.28% | 2.52% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.77% | 3.09% | 2.68% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 3.85% | 2.29% | 1.56% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 3.10% | 1.95% | 1.15% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.27% | 1.66% | 0.61% |
| BABoeing Co | 1.98% | 1.83% | 0.15% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 1.51% | 1.35% | 0.16% |
| PCARPaccar Inc. | 1.11% | 1.23% | 0.12% |
| LNTAlliant Energy Corp. | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.52% |
38.8% of BLCV is already inside MFSV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLCV or MFSV?
BLCV has an expense ratio of 0.45% while MFSV charges 0.44%. MFSV is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BLCV or MFSV?
Over the past year BLCV returned +21.62% vs +14.44% for MFSV, so BLCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BLCV annualized +15.06% vs +10.20% for MFSV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BLCV or MFSV?
BLCV has been the more volatile fund at 13.5% annualized versus 9.6% for MFSV. Worst drawdown: BLCV -12.6% vs MFSV -12.7%.
Should I hold both BLCV and MFSV?
BLCV and MFSV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BLCV and MFSV?
38.8% of BLCV's money is in holdings MFSV also owns. 27.7% of MFSV's is in holdings BLCV also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in BLCV and 60 in MFSV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLCV or MFSV?
BLCV yields 1.21% while MFSV yields 1.32%, so MFSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MFSV better than BLCV?
MFSV has a lower expense ratio. BLCV led over 1Y and the full window. MFSV is less concentrated, with 32.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.