CPTL vs IVV
Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CPTL | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $121M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.37% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 146 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +13.38% | +13.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.25% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.77% | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.18% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
CPTL vs IVV Performance
Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF (CPTL) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CPTL returned +20.25% while IVV returned +21.62%. Year to date, CPTL is up 13.38% versus a gain of 13.22% for IVV.
Over three years, CPTL compounded at +18.77% per year against +22.17% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +10.18% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, CPTL has the edge at +13.04% annualized vs +7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CPTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.2% for CPTL and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CPTL charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CPTL currently yields 2.37% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CPTL and IVV share 110 holdings out of 522 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CPTL or IVV?
CPTL has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CPTL or IVV?
Over the past year CPTL returned +20.25% vs +21.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), CPTL annualized +13.04% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CPTL or IVV?
CPTL has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CPTL -36.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CPTL and IVV?
CPTL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between CPTL and IVV?
CPTL and IVV share 110 common holdings with a 21.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 522 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CPTL or IVV?
CPTL yields 2.37% while IVV yields 1.10%, so CPTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.