CPTL vs IVV
Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CPTL or IVV?
Nearly the same fund. IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. CPTL is less concentrated, with 37.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CPTL | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $116M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.32% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 158 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +11.44% | +12.27%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.10% | +17.04%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.84% | +21.24%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.81% | +13.08%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.2% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,966 | $18,490Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.7%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 12, 2016 to Sep 17, 2026 (10.2 years).
CPTL vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.2 years both funds cover.
CPTL vs IVV Performance
Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF (CPTL) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CPTL returned +16.10% while IVV returned +17.04%. Year to date, CPTL is up 11.44% versus a gain of 12.27% for IVV.
Over three years, CPTL compounded at +17.84% per year against +21.24% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.81% and +13.08% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.09% annualized vs +12.74%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CPTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 15.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.2% for CPTL and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CPTL charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CPTL currently yields 2.32% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
97.9% of CPTL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 63.2% of IVV's money is in holdings CPTL also owns.
Most of CPTL is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
141 positions in common, counted across the 154 positions we hold weights for in CPTL and 490 in IVV, against full books of 158 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 341 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for CPTL (35.4% of the fund), and 11 for CPTL that do not appear in IVV (1.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CPTL | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.82% | 8.07% | 3.25% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.85% | 7.02% | 2.17% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.95% | 5.69% | 0.74% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.98% | 3.84% | 0.14% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.39% | 2.65% | 0.74% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.21% | 3.00% | 0.79% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.35% | 1.44% | 1.91% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 3.31% | 1.39% | 1.92% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.25% | 1.38% | 1.87% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.91% | 1.56% | 1.35% |
97.9% of CPTL is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CPTL or IVV?
CPTL has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CPTL or IVV?
Over the past year CPTL returned +16.10% vs +17.04% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), CPTL annualized +12.74% vs +14.09% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CPTL or IVV?
CPTL has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 15.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CPTL -36.2% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both CPTL and IVV?
CPTL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CPTL and IVV?
97.9% of CPTL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 63.2% of IVV's is in holdings CPTL also owns. They hold 141 positions in common, counted across the 154 positions we hold weights for in CPTL and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, CPTL or IVV?
CPTL yields 2.32% while IVV yields 1.06%, so CPTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than CPTL?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. CPTL is less concentrated, with 37.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.