CPTL vs VYM
Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 613 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CPTL | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $116M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.37% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 158 | 613 | |
| YTD Return | +11.67% | +14.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.38% | +20.67% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.51% | +18.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.43% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.2% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2016 | Nov 10, 2006 |
CPTL vs VYM Performance
Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF (CPTL) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CPTL returned +18.38% while VYM returned +20.67%. Year to date, CPTL is up 11.67% versus a gain of 14.18% for VYM.
Over three years, CPTL compounded at +17.51% per year against +18.47% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.43% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, CPTL has the edge at +12.83% annualized vs +6.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CPTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 14.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.2% for CPTL and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CPTL charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CPTL currently yields 2.37% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
CPTL and VYM share 60 holdings out of 696 unique holdings combined, representing a 35.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CPTL or VYM?
CPTL has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CPTL or VYM?
Over the past year CPTL returned +18.38% vs +20.67% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), CPTL annualized +12.83% vs +6.97% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CPTL or VYM?
CPTL has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 14.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CPTL -36.2% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both CPTL and VYM?
CPTL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between CPTL and VYM?
CPTL and VYM share 60 common holdings with a 35.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 696 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CPTL or VYM?
CPTL yields 2.37% while VYM yields 2.24%, so CPTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.