CPTL vs VTI
Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CPTL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $121M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.37% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 146 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.41% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.51% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.41% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.84% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
CPTL vs VTI Performance
Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF (CPTL) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CPTL returned +19.51% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, CPTL is up 12.41% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, CPTL compounded at +18.41% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.84% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, CPTL has the edge at +12.94% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CPTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.2% for CPTL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CPTL charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CPTL currently yields 2.37% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CPTL and VTI share 118 holdings out of 2796 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CPTL or VTI?
CPTL has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CPTL or VTI?
Over the past year CPTL returned +19.51% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), CPTL annualized +12.94% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CPTL or VTI?
CPTL has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CPTL -36.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CPTL and VTI?
CPTL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between CPTL and VTI?
CPTL and VTI share 118 common holdings with a 19.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2796 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CPTL or VTI?
CPTL yields 2.37% while VTI yields 1.07%, so CPTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.