CPTL vs VOO
Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CPTL | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $116M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.37% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 158 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +11.67% | +12.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.38% | +20.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.51% | +20.90% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.43% | +12.59% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CPTL vs VOO Performance
Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF (CPTL) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CPTL returned +18.38% while VOO returned +20.36%. Year to date, CPTL is up 11.67% versus a gain of 12.13% for VOO.
Over three years, CPTL compounded at +17.51% per year against +20.90% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.43% and +12.59% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.41% annualized vs +12.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CPTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.2% for CPTL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CPTL charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CPTL currently yields 2.37% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
CPTL and VOO share 142 holdings out of 516 unique holdings combined, representing a 54.5% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CPTL or VOO?
CPTL has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CPTL or VOO?
Over the past year CPTL returned +18.38% vs +20.36% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), CPTL annualized +12.83% vs +13.41% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CPTL or VOO?
CPTL has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CPTL -36.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CPTL and VOO?
CPTL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between CPTL and VOO?
CPTL and VOO share 142 common holdings with a 54.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 516 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CPTL or VOO?
CPTL yields 2.37% while VOO yields 1.08%, so CPTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.