CPTL vs VOO
Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CPTL or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CPTL | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $116M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.32% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 158 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +13.14% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.39% | +17.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.57% | +23.16%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.44% | +13.85%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.2% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,430 | $19,128Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.7% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 12, 2016 to Sep 21, 2026 (10.2 years).
CPTL vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.2 years both funds cover.
CPTL vs VOO Performance
Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF (CPTL) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CPTL returned +16.39% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, CPTL is up 13.14% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Over three years, CPTL compounded at +19.57% per year against +23.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.44% and +13.85% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +14.30% annualized vs +12.90%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CPTL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.3% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.2% for CPTL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CPTL charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CPTL currently yields 2.32% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
98.7% of CPTL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 63.9% of VOO's money is in holdings CPTL also owns.
Most of CPTL is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
145 positions in common, counted across the 154 positions we hold weights for in CPTL and 494 in VOO, against full books of 158 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 343 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for CPTL (35.4% of the fund), and 8 for CPTL that do not appear in VOO (1.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CPTL | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.82% | 7.55% | 2.73% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.85% | 7.05% | 2.20% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.95% | 5.36% | 0.41% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.98% | 4.13% | 0.15% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.39% | 2.86% | 0.53% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.21% | 3.24% | 1.03% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.35% | 1.46% | 1.89% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 3.31% | 1.46% | 1.85% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.25% | 1.41% | 1.84% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 1.76% | 2.62% | 0.86% |
98.7% of CPTL is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CPTL or VOO?
CPTL has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CPTL or VOO?
Over the past year CPTL returned +16.39% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), CPTL annualized +12.90% vs +14.30% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CPTL or VOO?
CPTL has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CPTL -36.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CPTL and VOO?
CPTL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CPTL and VOO?
98.7% of CPTL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 63.9% of VOO's is in holdings CPTL also owns. They hold 145 positions in common, counted across the 154 positions we hold weights for in CPTL and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, CPTL or VOO?
CPTL yields 2.32% while VOO yields 1.04%, so CPTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than CPTL?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.