GGUS vs IVV
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGUS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $466M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.43% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 362 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +5.49% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.94% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 28, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
GGUS vs IVV Performance
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GGUS returned +12.94% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, GGUS is up 5.49% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.7% for GGUS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGUS charges 0.12% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $3 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGUS currently yields 0.43% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GGUS and IVV share 173 holdings out of 685 unique holdings combined, representing a 53.9% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGUS or IVV?
GGUS has an expense ratio of 0.12% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $9 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GGUS or IVV?
Over the past year GGUS returned +12.94% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), GGUS annualized +21.16% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GGUS or IVV?
GGUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GGUS -22.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GGUS and IVV?
GGUS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GGUS and IVV?
GGUS and IVV share 173 common holdings with a 53.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 685 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGUS or IVV?
GGUS yields 0.43% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.