GGUS vs VOO
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GGUS or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGUS | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $478M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.43% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 362 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +4.09% | +11.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.97% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.7% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $16,712 | $17,283Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.6% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 28, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 30, 2023 to Sep 10, 2026 (2.8 years).
GGUS vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.8 years both funds cover.
GGUS vs VOO Performance
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGUS returned +6.97% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, GGUS is up 4.09% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 11.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.7% for GGUS and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGUS charges 0.12% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $3 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGUS currently yields 0.43% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
92.6% of GGUS's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 67.1% of VOO's money is in holdings GGUS also owns.
Most of GGUS is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, GGUS as of Sep 1, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
176 positions in common, counted across the 360 positions we hold weights for in GGUS and 505 in VOO, against full books of 362 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 320 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for GGUS (32.3% of the fund), and 140 for GGUS that do not appear in VOO (6.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GGUS | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 13.28% | 7.51% | 5.77% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.05% | 6.59% | 2.54% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 4.78% | 4.30% | 0.48% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 5.20% | 3.25% | 1.95% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 4.21% | 2.59% | 1.62% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.83% | 2.77% | 1.06% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.75% | 2.02% | 1.73% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 3.71% | 1.84% | 1.87% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 3.52% | 1.92% | 1.60% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.30% | 1.47% | 1.83% |
92.6% of GGUS is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGUS or VOO?
GGUS has an expense ratio of 0.12% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GGUS or VOO?
Over the past year GGUS returned +6.97% vs +17.54% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GGUS or VOO?
GGUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 11.8% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GGUS -22.7% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both GGUS and VOO?
GGUS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GGUS and VOO?
92.6% of GGUS's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 67.1% of VOO's is in holdings GGUS also owns. They hold 176 positions in common, counted across the 360 positions we hold weights for in GGUS and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGUS or VOO?
GGUS yields 0.43% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than GGUS?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.